Comparative Biometric
Testing
> Round 6 Public Report available for
download
IBG's Comparative Biometric
Testing (CBT) is the industry's longest-running scenario test
effort. CBT measures the accuracy and usability of
commercial fingerprint, face recognition, iris recognition, voice recognition,
signature recognition,
hand geometry, and emerging biometrics systems.
> Participant Overview (pdf)
CBT Benefits
Broad Dissemination of Results to Decision-Makers across Government and Industry. The CBT Public Report, including performance data for all evaluated systems, is relied upon by IBG’s worldwide audience of thousands of decision-makers and industry professionals in hundreds of government and commercial organizations.
Access to Detailed System Performance Data. Reliable performance data relative to competing modalities and systems is difficult to collect. CBT generates benchmark performance data essential to engineering teams, product developers, and sales and marketing staff. In addition to the core test metrics, CBT generates demographic- and test subject-specific performance data, helping vendors identify areas for improvement in their capture and matching technologies.
Independent, Third-Party Biometric Performance Certification.Biometric system accuracy and usability are essential considerations for government and commercial deployers, technology partners, and investors. Third-party testing by credible and experienced testing organizations is a precondition of procurement for many deployers. IBG has been recognized as the industry's leading source of objective performance data since the late 1990's.

Comparative Biometric Testing
addresses the following questions critical to successful
deployments:
- How do leading technologies compare in
terms of False Match Rates, False Non-Match Rates, and
Failure to Enroll Rates?
- How well do technologies perform under
real-world conditions with typical users?
- Which technologies are able to enroll the
largest percentage of users?
- What percentage
of enrolled users are falsely matched and non-matched?
- Do error rates increase over time?
- How well do
biometric devices address ergonomic and ease-of-use
issues?
- Which technologies and devices are ready
to deploy in operational environments?
Understanding biometric
technologies' accuracy and performance under real-world
conditions is a precondition of effectively deploying
biometrics. Error rates encountered by actual users - including
false match rates, false non-match rates, and failure to enroll
rates - often differ from error rates generated in laboratory
tests using databases of biometric samples.
Standards Compliance
CBT conforms to the
following approved U.S. standards for biometric
performance testing.
>
ANSI INCITS 409.1-2005
Biometric Performance Testing
and Reporting - Part 1: Principles and Framework
>
ANSI INCITS 409.3-2005
Biometric Performance Testing
and Reporting - Part 3: Scenario Testing and Reporting
The CBT Test Director, Michael
Thieme, is the editor of
ANSI INCITS 409.3-2005 and
ISO/IEC JTC1 SC37
19795-2: Testing Methodologies for Technology and Scenario
Evaluation.
CBT sponsors have included
Honeywell, Microsoft, American Airlines, Lockheed
Martin, EDS, Fidelity Investments, Star Systems, and the
Financial Services Technology Consortium.
CBT Downloads
>
Test Plan
(pdf)
>
Requirements
(pdf)
>
Biometric Performance Certification FAQ
(pdf)
>
IBG's presentation
on Lessons Learned
from Comparative Biometric Testing (pdf)
> A partial list of
IBG performance report recipients
(pdf)
Comparative Biometric
Testing and Performance Certification
Systems tested in CBT that
meet accuracy and usability criteria obtain
Biometric Performance Certification. For more information on
Biometric Performance Certification, please contact
Michael
Thieme at International Biometric Group.
CBT History
IBG tests between ten and
twelve leading biometric systems in each Comparative
Biometric Test round. To date, more than 50 biometric
systems have been tested. Technologies tested to date
include fingerprint, face recognition, iris recognition, voice
recognition, signature recognition, hand geometry, and
keystroke biometrics. Below is a partial list of systems tested in CBT.
| Vein Recognition |
Fingerprint |
Iris Recognition |
Fujitsu |
ActivCard |
IrisGuard |
| Hitachi |
AuthenTec |
Iridian |
| |
BIO-Key |
LG Electronics |
| Keystroke Dynamics |
Biometric Security Card |
|
| BioNet Systems |
Bioscrypt |
Voice Recognition |
| |
DigitalPersona |
Nuance |
| Signature Recognition |
Fujitsu |
T-NETIX (SpeechWorks) |
| Cyber-SIGN |
Identix |
|
| |
Indivos |
Face Recognition |
| Hand Geometry |
NEC |
Cognitec |
| Recognition Systems, Inc. |
NITGen |
AcSys Biometrics |
| |
Precise Biometrics |
Viisage |
| Skin Texture |
SAGEM MORPHO |
Visionics (Identix) |
| Delean Vision |
SecuGen |
|
| |
Sony |
|
| |
ST Microelectronics |
|
| |
Ultra-Scan |
|
|